More About “C” In Its Current Incarnation

First a note on “Genie In a Bottle.” I got it wrong, but I was in a bookstore that didn’t have the book, and I was working from memory.

I’ve never made any bones about the fact that I’ll learn from anyone who can teach me. There’s a screenplay writer named Blake Snyder who wrote a book called Save The Cat! It’s strictly about screenwriting, it’s about his method of categorizing screenplay genres and developing screenplays, and all of this fits within the rigid format of the commercial screenplay. If you read it thinking it applies word for word to writing novels, you’ll end up wearing an unnecessary straightjacket while you write.

But if you remember that you as a novelist are not in any way constrained by the three-act, 110-page format with strict A and B stories screenwriters must follow (if they hope to sell), it becomes one of the best guides to good storytelling I’ve ever come across. And it was by sitting in the bookstore working out the beats of a screenplay from (admittedly poor) memory that I figured out how to redo “C” so that it would work as a story.

Snyder takes you through ten genres he’s come up with–ways of categorizing stories. Again, novels are MUCH more flexible than what he presents for screenwriters, but again, if you keep that in mind, you’ll find that most of what you’ve written either fits pretty well into one of his ten genres, or you’re stuck on it because it isn’t working as a story.

So that’s a long way of saying that my “Genie in the Bottle” note at the top of the page is my misremembering of his classification of “Out of the Bottle” stories, of which “C” is (more or less) one. “C”, however, fuses elements of “Rite of Passage” stories (another of his genres), which I can do because I’m writing a novel, and which probably wouldn’t work too well for a screenwriter because I have the glorious elbow room of 100,000 words in which to create A, B, C, and D stories, themes and subthemes, and because, writing a novel, I don’t have to worry a bit about budgets, special effects, being rewritten by credit jumpers, or any of the other miseries that await screenwriters.

In any case, “C” does involve time travel. It knowingly breaks some very specific and nearly universal rules of time travel stories. Because I know the rules, and have a critical REASON WHY, I think I can get away with it, but we’ll see.

“C” doesn’t have anything to do with Cadence Drake or Badger. I haven’t given up on them, but they’re not what are keeping me up nights.

And… I’m having a wonderful time working this all out. Thank you, and thanks for letting me know about your secret projects. They’re exciting stuff, and I hope you have as much fun with yours as I’m having with mine.

As for what I’m doing online at this hour on Mother’s Day… we’re under a tornado watch, and Matt stayed up for hours watching the weather. I’m standing watch now so he can catch a few hours’ sleep.

image_pdfDownload as PDFimage_printPrint Page







4 responses to “More About “C” In Its Current Incarnation”

  1. Holly Avatar

    I hope that includes “the status quo must always be restored / maintained by the end of the story.”

    That would be the first rule I’m breaking…yes. 😀 Guessing you’ll like this one, then.

  2. Jess Avatar

    Funny you should mention it because I just read STC a week ago and it finally clarified structure for me in a way that nothing else I’ve read really has (with the given novelist wiggle room).

    Good luck with C! Oh, and I’m reading The Ruby Key as a Reward Book for finishing the first draft of my MS… I love it so far, and was especially pleased when I noticed the beautiful blue ink on the INSIDE of the book too!

  3. MattScudder Avatar

    I’ve read Save the Cat, too. Interesting stuff. And his “genres” are a great way of discovering the kinds of stories that resonate with you. I’m all about “Dude With a Problem” and the “Whydunit.” 🙂

  4. vanity Avatar

    “It knowingly breaks some very specific and nearly universal rules of time travel stories.”

    I hope that includes “the status quo must always be restored / maintained by the end of the story.”

    I absolutely loathe that one and hate how almost all time travel stories follow it.

    The only exceptions I can think of off the top of my head are the advanced holo projector for the doctor on startrek voyager and time cop. The latter only counts marginally, as one can argue that the original time line, which happened before the movie started, was restored.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x