Holly Lisle: Official Author Website
My Facebook PageFollow me on Twitter
Holly Lisle, photo by the author, copyright 2009

   Home | Writers | ReadersWriting Diary | My Books | Author
   HollyShop | Novel Writing Course | Affiliate | Site Map

   How To Revise Your Novel | HTRYN.com Scholarship Contest (limited time)

From the category archives:

Rants & Observations

I HATE computers

by Holly Lisle on August 6, 2009 · 13 comments

in Computers, Rants & Observations

I just lost three hours of editing on Section 1 of THE WRITING CRAFT: How To Motivate Yourself.

Application crashed. All gone. I still have the original recording. Now I get to do all the video cutting and resizing and retaping of stuff that I messed up the first time AGAIN.

Argh.

(NOTE: This is not the most current “Write a book with me” post. This is me being grumpy. The most current Write A Book With Me post will be the top post linked here.)

{ 13 comments }

As noted elsewhere—I hauled ass like nobody’s business for eight months to create a way for me to write the novel I wanted to write without having to do it to anybody’s specifications but my own.

My mad plan worked, and for the first time since I was an RN, I had a regular, reasonable income that did not depend on me writing at a hard run in order to keep us all fed.

I got started on the Dreaming the Dead—the novel of my passion—and I was having a wonderful time with it, sitting down late at night every night and getting as many words as I got before I fell asleep. No pressure, no specific deadline (a vague one in the back of my mind only), and not even any dedication to the idea of writing to a market or marketing the book when it was done. I was writing for the sheer love of writing—to spend time with characters I could not find anywhere else, to explore a fascinating problem, to uncover mysteries and wonders.

Yes, I fully intended to send it to my agent. When it was done. When I was damn good and ready.

And then…

And then…

Brief aside here: You might have noticed, if you’ve been around here or in Think Sideways, that I … ah … am not a good relaxer. I am very good at deadlines, very good at pushing hard toward goals, very good at driving myself.

Taking my time? Taking it easy? Doing things just for fun? Not my best skill. I know this about me, but I sometimes forget it. End Brief Aside.

I forgot why I had worked so hard last year and part of this one. I forgot that THIS book was supposed to be special, different, NOT the same ferocious race to the finish line, doing the absolute best I could in the absolute least time humanly possible so that I could get paid and we could eat.

I forgot. And I set what seemed like a reasonable deadline for myself. 2000 words a day, more or less.

I also forgot that my life is different now. When writing fiction was all I had, writing fiction WAS all I had. I could put the rest of the world aside for long stretches and just push for the finish line.

I wrote, I got frustrated and guilty because I wasn’t getting other things done. When I got other things done, I got frustrated and guilty because I wasn’t writing. Over the last couple of days, I got hammered by headaches, stress, and guilt, my productivity on everything dropped to miserable levels, and I started hating life. In one week. From one change: the decision to write Dreaming the Dead to a “publish it” deadline.

I sat down this morning and took stock of what I have going on that is NOT the novel—stuff I love and am thrilled to be doing and want to complete.

You can look at the mindmap I did here, or the outline version here.

The fact is, my life is full of cool and wonderful work. And writing fiction is the cool and wonderful play I had planned for the end of each day.

I need to get back to my original plan.

{ 14 comments }

In light of the recent reader-generated digressions in comments to a previous post, that’s a fair question. It was asked to me privately by someone I like who was asking out of concern for me—out of fear that I was being too much myself on my weblog, and not enough the sort of person readers would expect me to be.

So I’ll answer from that angle—to the person who likes me and is afraid my honesty and bluntness are hurting me.

My writing diary/ weblog is not some carefully packaged promotional tool that I use to “build readership,” “market my books,” or any of the rest of that crap. It’s the place where I discuss writing and other things that are important to me.

Let me say that again. It matters.

This is where I discuss writing and other things that are important to me.

I’m going to take a moment to explain why that matters, and I’m going to break it down by section, so you will see where I’m coming from, and understand why, on occasion, I am not gentle or “nice” with someone who comments here.

First, writing.

Aside from my love for my family and friends, writing is at the core of how I make my life meaningful to myself.

Words matter. Words and what they mean and how you relate to them change your thinking, your actions, your philosophy, your existence.

I don’t write for you. I write for me. I write to create the stories I want to read, the stories that I cannot find on bookshelves, the stories that are about more than just a relationship, or just an adventure. I want to read stories written from a coherent, well-thought-out viewpoint, where the worldbuilding has been created and not copied, where the characters are doing things important to them, where the underlying theme is about something important.

I don’t want to read about puppets of destiny becoming king of the world, and I don’t want to read about helpless, stupid women being rescued from their lives by good-looking men with no brains. Especially, I don’t want to read about those women and those men if them hooking up is the whole story. What are they about? What is their story about? If neither is about anything I consider valuable, I don’t need them.

So I am writing stories that I personally consider important, and I am fortunate that what I love is what enough other people want to read that I have been able to make a career of writing.

If you like my books, that’s fantastic. If you don’t, there are countless other books by countless other writers where you’ll be able to find what you do like. Or, if you’re a lot like me, there won’t be any, or many, and you end up writing the books you wanted to read and couldn’t find anywhere else.

More on writing—this time how I connect writing with other people who also love writing.

My life is joyful and exuberant because I am doing what I love. There is enough of the missionary left over from my childhood that I want to be able to share the best of what I have discovered about writing and how to be good at it with people who also love to write. And who are willing to do the work themselves once pointed in the right direction.

I’m not big on handholding. If you want to be a writer, you have to be willing to do the work, and there’s a lot of work involved.

If you’re willing to work, though, I’ll bend over backwards to show you exactly what I’ve done, what has worked for me and what has failed for me, because I know that even though a writing life is financially hard sometimes, (especially if it’s your actual income), it’s a great life in which you wake up every day glad to be alive—and if you want to do that, I think you should be able to. And I’ll make what I’ve learned available to you in a variety of forms so that you can create your own best life.

I still won’t read what you’ve written, (unless I ask you for a sample, as in the Writer Crash Tests), and I still am not available for one-on-one mentoring at any price because I have my writing, I have my writing courses, and I have my family—and that’s a full plate.

Other things that matter to me, and that I from time to time discuss here.

At the core of who I am is the knowledge that our lives matter to others whether we choose to make them matter to ourselves or not. If you choose to make your life matter by making it valuable to you and acting for your own personal highest good, other people as well as you will benefit. If you think your life is of no value, then you will suffer, the people who love you will suffer, because you will act in self-destructive or outwardly destructive ways. If you choose to force your own values on others, destruction will again result.

From this basis, I hold sacred both freedom of religion and political freedom, because each of those freedoms allows every individual to pursue his own highest good without oppression.

I detest both religion and politics because both demand a “buy-in”—the revocation of personal reason either through a requirement for faith in the unprovable, or in agreement with a party platform “for the greater good”—and both religions and governments are institutions of oppression that coerce behavior from the unwilling through overt force (voluntary income tax?) or the threat of force (a.k.a. “You’re gonna burn in Hell for that one, Sparkie.”)

So I speak here about things I see going on in the world around me from this viewpoint. I riff on the idiocy of the global warming theory, I point out drifts I see from freedom toward oppression in such legal issues as the right to die movement or abortion, I point out the intellectual dishonesty of a women’s movement that has drifted from equal pay for equal work to declaring a woman who murdered her children a “victim.” And I note the inexorable creep of political parties and special interest groups to create division among people, encouraging everyone to pick sides against those different from themselves, playing the politics of race, religion, and special interest as a classic Roman “divide and conquer” ploy that, no matter the party in power, always leaves more power in the hands of the government, and less in the hands of the people.

You are encouraged not to trust those different from you, because they are out to get you. The guys on the other side of your personal issues, whatever they may be, are encouraged to do the same. Meanwhile, the government steps in and says, “Here, let us protect you from them.” And you lose your rights in return for safety from something that never threatened you in the first place.

And all of that comes down to this.

This is my space. It is an extension of my living room, where you are an invited guest. This is, however, my place to say what I think, and I won’t pretend to be someone I’m not in order to appease some small god of marketing who thinks my sales would be better if I were plastic and fake.

And in my place, I have a few rules.

First and foremost, freedom of speech belongs to the one who owns the press, and this place is mine. I reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason. Most I will let stand, but I have no intention of letting troublemakers and jerks run rampant across my comments, any more than I would tolerate such behavior in my home.

Next, I am as kind to my guests as they are to me.

You want to discuss things, I’ll discuss them as I have the time. You have questions, ditto. I will not seek an argument or pick a fight.

If you seek to debate, I may decide to play if you’re interesting and if I have time. I like to debate. I like to test out my philosophy against an opponent who holds an opinion different than mine, simply to see if I have it right, or if my opinion needs revision.

If I think you’re trying to pick a fight, I’ll either delete your post (if you’re simply obnoxious), or I’ll debate you, (if you’re obnoxious but interesting). I will not use against you any tools of words that you do not use against me first, so if you maintain a level of polite discourse, I will do the same.

If you lead with sanctimony, condescension, or insult, or if you are not willing to back up your statements with facts, I may decide it would be more fun to sharpen my logic on you and use you as an exercise in debate and an example of what not to do here rather than just delete you, or ban you. If you make a real jackass of yourself, then I’ll ban you.

If that makes me mean, okay.

I never claimed to be nice. I can be kind, but I detest niceness—it is pretending to be someone you aren’t in order to gain social approval. I’m not looking for anyone else’s approval. I already have my own.

{ 27 comments }

More on Global Warming.

Global Climate Crisis…

Weather…

Whatever.

And my previous posts on same.

{ 5 comments }

The writer of this is Quaker (I used to be) and a visiting scholar at Yale Divinity School. My personal take on any religion is “no, thanks,” but I am a firm supporter of freedom of religion. And of tolerance, defined as follows: I will tolerate you, your quirks, and your beliefs, if you will tolerate me, my quirks, and my beliefs, and if nothing you do imposes on the rights of others to life, liberty, and the pursuit of lawful happiness. I, in my part, will not impose on your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of lawful happiness.

I will not pretend to be someone I’m not in order to have you like me under false pretenses. I ask that you return the favor.

And I don’t tolerate child molesters, rapists, murderers, or factions of religions whose only happiness can be achieved if I am subsumed into their religion, or killed for not joining.

This is, I think, a reasonable definition of tolerance. It may not be perfect, but neither am I.

And with that thought, I give you Sarah Ruden writing for the Wall Street Journal on Yale’s Christian/Muslim Reconciliation Conference.

Some of what she had to say made me think of Talyn. Some of it made me think of Hawkspar.

Thanks to Jim for the link.

{ 4 comments }

Back to global warming, and the following astonishing article. (Thanks to Jim Woosley for the link) The world has never seen such freezing heat

I was reading comments on one other article about global warming—in which the sad state of the global warmists increasingly frayed argument was being discussed—and one snarky young thing said, “It isn’t global warming anymore, you idiots, it’s the Global Climate Crisis!”

‘Scuse me?

We have three options here.

Option One is that the world is faced with dangerous overheating, which would be proven by steadily rising temperatures worldwide, steadily decreasing glaciation worldwide, and steadily rising sea levels worldwide. We do not have that triad in place—for every location that has warmer temps, there’s another with colder temps, and the falling average temperature the past couple of years makes global warming a hard sell.

Oh, and we would also have worse hurricanes every year than the year before. I’ll pause while you consider the hurricane seasons of the past couple of years.

The “global warming is caused by humans theory”, if true, would show a measurable, steady increase in temperatures, dangerous weather, and rising sea levels everywhere, all the time. Increases would necessarily be small, but they would be observable.

We do not have this.

Option Two is that NOW the world is faced by dangerous overcooling, which would be proven by steadily falling temperatures worldwide, steadily expanding glaciation worldwide, and steadily falling sea levels worldwide. We don’t have THAT triad in place either.

Again, for it to be true, we would see small, incremental, MEASURABLE changes everywhere.

So I’m going to define Option Three for you now, since the folks selling the panic phrase Global Climate Crisis fail to define this crisis.

Option Three—Global Climate Crisis—means that we will have rising temperatures around the world, followed by falling temperatures around the world—all going on at the same time—with storm systems, hurricanes, tornadoes and so on happening somewhere all the time. The ice caps and glaciers will expand, and then retreat, and then expand, and then RETREAT!!!! (Oh, God, whatever shall we do?)

The other name for the Global Climate Crisis?

Weather.

It’s the end of the world as we know it.

Here’s everything else I’ve written on this particular subject.

{ 28 comments }

Obama’s Thought Police

by Holly Lisle on June 10, 2008 · 43 comments

in Personal, Rants & Observations

Here’s a fun little story for you. Barack Obama has hired on an Internet team to intimidate bloggers who don’t kiss his ass. To think I’d pegged this guy as someone to vote for. Had discussed him positively with my husband and adult kids, had mentioned him somewhere in this blog as being a possible step in the right direction for the country.

Of course, that was before I found out ex-Weathermen were funding his campaign, that he has the single most leftist voting record in the Senate, and that he’s sponsored a bill to fingerprint all mortgage lenders, treating them like criminals. (Does innocent until PROVEN guilty still mean anything to anyone in this country)?

And now this. Sure, the article says the team is just going to combat rumors. So what I want to know is, are they going to combat rumors while wearing a uniform—that is, are they going to identify themselves. Or are they going to cheat, to pretend to just be regular readers of the blogs they attack?

And let’s see how long it takes them to expand their mission, to start going after anyone who suggests Obama might not be the Promised One, might just be another scumbag politician, might in fact be the biggest scumbag running this year (and considering the field, that’s digging pretty deep).

After I discovered Obama was just another crapmeister (thus making the field a perfect three-for-three), I wasn’t sure I was going to waste my time with a vote for President this year. Now I might have to, just to vote against him.

{ 43 comments }

So we got our kid a Painted Lady butterfly kit as part of his science education this year–if you watch kids’ or educational channels, you’ve seen these kits on TV.

The ads appeal to the scientist in kids, and to the “hey, cool” factor in parents, so we willingly sent off for the butterfly treehouse, and when we got it, filled out the coupon and sent for the live caterpillars.

The first Painted Lady caterpillars arrived a week later, five of them, all about the size of mouse droppings (I have lived in some exciting places in my life, and know what these look like), and unfortunately, all DOA (dead on arrival).

The kid took it pretty well, considering.

Warily, because while the first batch was cheap, the refills were expensive, I sent off for a second batch.

These arrived in wonderful shape, vigorously munching away in their safe, moisture-free container, and within a few days, we had five chrysalids ready to be transferred to their treehouse, where they would complete the change from lumpy, ugly caterpillars to lovely butterflies. All was well, the kid was thrilled, I was relieved.

The kid and I pinned the paper on which the caterpillars had attached their chrysalids to the inside of the butterfly treehouse, and carefully following instructions, found a sturdy surface where they would not be in direct sunlight, would not get knocked over, and would be able to complete their transformation in peace and safety.

We imagined a future scene something like this:

In a perfect world, this is the way things work.

In the Deep South, however, we have fire ants.

If you can drive a riding mower over an anthill and have the anthill stall the mower, welcome to the Deep South. If you can do it twenty or thirty times in the same yard (I do not have a lawn, I have a yard) welcome to my world. Fire ant mounds get to be about a foot-and-a-half to two feet across, and can hit a foot in height. The mounds, furthermore seem to have territories with about a seven-to-ten foot diameter, so if you’re mowing 3 acres of barely-converted pasture, you’ll hit a lot of them.

Don’t step on them, don’t mess with them. Be a little careful about ever going to sleep. And, if you have a well and value the drinkability of your water, learn to live with them.

BUT ALSO….

Ignore every carefully-detailed instruction in the pamphlet on raising butterflies that in any way suggests you should keep your butterfly treehouse on the floor.

We came out today to one of those Wild Kingdom lions-ripping-the-innards-out-of-zebras scenes in miniature that makes you more than a little queasy. The fire ants had found the crysalids, and were tearing into them with the sort of gusto they’d exercise on us if we couldn’t get up and run.

Looking at that mess, I figured our future butterflies were all dead. I dragged the thing into the kitchen, with the kid trailing me, and started pulling everything out of the treehouse. The kid was tragic–stoic on the outside and mad and on the edge of tears, his hands balled into fists.

Two of the chrysalids had gaping holes in them. A third did not, but did not wriggle when touched—odds are he was dead right then. Two others still wriggled, and I passed this news on to the kid, who underwent the sort of transformation I was hoping for from the damned bugs. He became radiantly happy and full of hope.

I killed all the ants in the treehouse (with my thumb–anything that would kill ants would certainly kill butterflies), shot their corpses out of the mesh with a can of compressed air, put a napkin on the bottom of the treehouse, put the three chrysalids that didn’t have holes eaten into them into the ant-free treehouse, and my hubby and I hung the thing from a knob on a high cabinet door, with the door swung open to be out of convenient reach of ants. I hope.

It may not help. By the time we got the chrysalids into the treehouse, none of them were still moving. So now we wait ten days, to see if any of the potential survivors survived. The kid knows that, in spite of everything we did, they’re probably all three already dead. We’re giving them a chance and hoping for the best, but this is one of those life lessons where the outcome will almost certainly hurt.

We aren’t soft-selling this. We didn’t shield the kid from the holes in the two partially-devoured chrysalids. I didn’t hide the nastiness from him when I cleaned out the mess. And he and his dad were with them when the last two stopped moving.

Life has consequences, we screwed up by not considering that around here, we have ants, and they’re nasty. We were responsible for the Painted Ladies’ lives, the kid and I, and we were responsible for their deaths. Something I’ve learned from personal experience as well as watching the parade of tragedies that came through my various ERs was that people who don’t learn how to deal with the consequences of little tragedies—who were shielded by their parents throughout their childhoods and who grow up thinking life is soft and safe—are people who fail to prevent preventable big tragedies, and who don’t have any tools to deal with any tragedies—preventable or not—when they happen. Kids who have had to deal with the pointy end of life early on, whether it’s butterflies-in-waiting devoured by invading predators or old cats who finally give out, are a little better braced for the bigger tragedies that await every one of us.

Go with grace, enjoy the beauty of the day and every sweet breath, because life is an amazing gift and a wonderful opportunity. But preview your actions for possible consequences—think before you leap. And watch your back.

It’s still a jungle out there.

{ 5 comments }

I Always Liked Montana

by Holly Lisle on March 14, 2008 · 11 comments

in Personal, Rants & Observations

This from the Patriot Post:

In the continuing saga of District of Columbia v. Heller, 39 of Montana’s elected officials have signed a resolution declaring that a Supreme Court ruling against the individual right of gun ownership would give their state grounds for leaving the union. It seems that when Montana’s settlers signed a statehood contract in 1889, one of the conditions was that the federal government agreed that individuals had the right to keep and bear arms. If the Supreme Court rules that firearm ownership is merely a state or “collective” right, Montana officials say that the statehood contract will have been breeched. “The U.S. would do well to keep its contractual promises to the states that the Second Amendment secures an individual right now as it did upon execution of the statehood contract,” Montana Secretary of State Brad Johnson said in a letter to The Washington Times. The Times also notes that the “collective right” interpretation of the Second Amendment doesn’t hold water in Montana because the state didn’t have a militia in the 1880s. “It’s pretty disingenuous as an argument,” Gary Marbut, president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, said. “At the time, they had no image of what a National Guard was. But history and logic don’t always prevail in these matters.” Indeed. Our advice to the Supreme Court is that before they upset somebody with their ruling, they might want to consider which side has the guns.”

I could see my way to moving there.

Pulitzer-Prize-winning playwright, screenwriter, and film director David Mamet’s conversion from arch-liberal to conservative was pretty heartening, too.

I’m not a Republican. Nor anything like. But where guns and free markets and education and the US Constitution are concerned, I’m deeply conservative.

{ 11 comments }

In my ongoing campaign to assure you that the sky is indeed falling*, the end of the world is nigh, and dogs and cats will soon be living together while glaciers devour your back yard as your house floats out to sea in the Alaskan tropics during this Worst Year Ever For Hurricanes, I bring you:

35 Inconvenient Truths
Or the Nifty PDF, if you’d rather keep a copy to share with all your friends.

Enjoy.

{ 11 comments }